[Summit] political discussions
barfootjim
barfootjim at gmail.com
Sat Oct 6 04:38:49 UTC 2012
I agree that discussions of political issues that we have in common
in this neighborhood should have a place in our discussions in
general - on the main list.
However, let's agree to a few politeness rules:
1) no personal attacks, name-calling, or disparaging personal remarks
aimed at ANY individual - keep it to what they say or do, not who
they are;
2) if you use statistics, or other facts, to bolster your point of
view, identify where you got them from;
3) no requests for contributions;
4) if you think a politician's approach is wrong, try to state why,
and if possible, suggest a better way to solve a problem
5) you are free to have an opinion based on nothing specific, but if
it's just that, say so.
This can be a useful tool to help us all consider the alternatives,
the plusses and minuses, and make informed decisions.
> Let the whole list weigh in, if it chooses, on whether political
> issues and questions are or are not appropriate for the main Summit
> list. Speaking for myself, I think that they are appropriate, and
> that this bears directly on the kind of community we want to have
> in Summit.
> ...
> ... it is a question of how we wish to be governed -- and only
> incidentally, which candidate might be more apt to govern us in the
> way we wish to be governed.
More information about the Summit
mailing list