[Summit] tot lot and community gardens

[Martha Fraenkel]

I agree with Emlyn's well-reasoned and patient comments.  Thank you, Emlyn.


  I wonder if someone can explain the history of the objection to using 
a portion of Lippitt Park?   I can guess, but ???


Martha








On 9/22/2012 7:54 AM, Emlyn Addison wrote:
>
>     I understand everyone's arguments here. Ideally the park would be
>     used by all -- urban gardeners, dog walkers, toddlers -- but 9th
>     Street is rather tiny. My beef is that up until a few years ago,
>     it was not filled with so many toys. 
>
> This proposal had nothing to do with the toys at this park in the 
> first place; it was and still is a discussion about introducing a 
> community garden model. That's it.
>
> The toys issue is a topic for another thread.
>
> Emlyn
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Summit mailing list
> Summit at sna.providence.ri.us
> http://sna.providence.ri.us/mailman/listinfo/summit_sna.providence.ri.us
> SNA Website: http://sna.providence.ri.us/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://sna.providence.ri.us/pipermail/summit_sna.providence.ri.us/attachments/20120922/d7693a1a/attachment.htm>