[Summit] tot lot and community gardens

[Greg Gerritt]

I hope to hear from the objector's at Lippitt park, and i wonder if their
views have changed give the state of global agriculture.  greg

From:  Martha Fraenkel <mfraenkel at gmail.com>
Date:  Sat, 22 Sep 2012 08:22:59 -0400
To:  Summit Neighborhood <summit at sna.providence.ri.us>
Subject:  [Summit] tot lot and community gardens

    
 I agree with Emlyn's well-reasoned and patient comments.  Thank you, Emlyn.
 
 
  I wonder if someone can explain the history of the objection to using a
portion of Lippitt Park?   I can guess, but ???
 
 
 Martha
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 On 9/22/2012 7:54 AM, Emlyn Addison wrote:
>  
>  
>> I understand everyone's arguments here. Ideally the park would be used by all
>> -- urban gardeners, dog walkers, toddlers -- but 9th Street is rather tiny.
>> My beef is that up until a few years ago, it was not filled with so many
>> toys. 
>  
>  
>  
> This proposal had nothing to do with the toys at this park in the first place;
> it was and still is a discussion about introducing a community garden model.
> That's it.
>  
> 
>  
>  
> The toys issue is a topic for another thread.
>  
> 
>  
>  
> Emlyn
>  
> 
>  
>  
>  
>   
>  
> _______________________________________________
> Summit mailing list
> Summit at sna.providence.ri.ushttp://sna.providence.ri.us/mailman/listinfo/summit
> _sna.providence.ri.us
> SNA Website: http://sna.providence.ri.us/
>  
 
_______________________________________________ Summit mailing list
Summit at sna.providence.ri.us
http://sna.providence.ri.us/mailman/listinfo/summit_sna.providence.ri.us SNA
Website: http://sna.providence.ri.us/

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://sna.providence.ri.us/pipermail/summit_sna.providence.ri.us/attachments/20120922/2e2d6b6b/attachment.htm>